Facebook said on
Monday that it had changed some of the procedures for its ‘Trending
Topics’ section after a news report alleging it suppressed conservative
news prompted a US Congressional demand for more transparency.
The company said an internal probe showed no evidence of political
bias in the selection of news stories for Trending Topics, a feature
that is separate from the main ‘news feed’ where most Facebook users get
their news.
But the world's largest social network said in a blogpost that it was
introducing several changes, including elimination of a top-ten list of
approved websites, more training and clearer guidelines to help human
editors avoid ideological or political bias, and more robust review
procedures. Earlier this month, a former Facebook contractor had accused
the company's editors of deliberately suppressing conservative news.
The allegations were reported by technology news website Gizmodo, which
did not identify the ex-contractor.
The report led Republican Sen. John Thune to write a letter demanding
that the company explain how it selects news articles for its Trending
Topics list.
Two days after Thune's letter, Facebook published a lengthy blogpost
detailing how Trending Topics works even though it rarely discloses such
practices. Previously, it had never discussed the inner workings of the
feature, which displays topics and news articles in the top right hand
corner of the desktop homepage for its more than 1.6 billion users.
Facebook said its investigation showed that conservative and liberal
topics were approved as trending topics at nearly identical rates. It
said it was unable to substantiate any allegations of politically
motivated suppression of particular subjects or sources.
But it did not rule out human error in selecting topics.
"Our investigation could not fully exclude the possibility of
isolated improper actions or unintentional bias in the implementation of
our guidelines or policies," Colin Stretch, Facebook's General Counsel,
wrote in a company blogpost.
Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg met last week with more than
a dozen conservative politicians and media personalities to discuss
issues of trust in the social network.
In his letter, Thune had called on Facebook to respond to the
criticism and sought answers by May 24 to several questions about its
internal practices.
"Any attempt by a neutral and inclusive social media platform to
censor or manipulate political discussion is an abuse of trust and
inconsistent with the values of an open internet," Thune said.